1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | While the evidence obtained during the investigation does confirm that Child#1 did sustain an injury, there is a lack of evidence that the injury was caused by a lack of supervision from the staff. The documentation and interview with the Director states that the injury was caused by an accident that could not have prevented since it happened while the child was trying to remove her socks while sitting near a table. A child sustaining an injury does not mean that it occurred due to a lack of supervision. A child sustaining an injury on accident also does not mean it was unavoidable despite proper supervision. It is not clear based on the evidence obtained during the investigation that a lack of supervision caused Child#1 to sustain an injury.
Based upon the evidence as presented above, this agency has investigated the allegation that child sustained an injury due to lack of supervision. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is found to be unsubstantiated at this time.
The notice of site inspection must remain posted for a period of 30 days during hours of operation. Failure to maintain posting will result in a civil penalty of $100.00 dollars.
Exit interview conducted with Director Megha Sahni. Appeal rights discussed and explained.
|