1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to the allegation, the facility is not wiping children thoroughly during diapering.
LPA received copies of text messages which document an issue reported to licensee via text regarding a child not being wiped thoroughly during diapering while at the facility. During interviews Licensee stated she was aware of the concern, which was brought to Licensee’s attention twice, once in person, and the second via text. Licensee stated she had a temporary assistant (Staff #2) (S2) for a few weeks who had changed the children’s diapers. Licensee stated after the first reported concern she talked to the employee, Staff #2 “about making sure diapers needed to be changed and wiped correctly.” Licensee stated after she was aware of the issue with a child not being wiped thoroughly by staff, she attempted to ensure the diapering was thorough and stated, “I would change the diapers after (Staff #2) did and make sure they were changed correctly”. Licensee stated that “On the second complaint day (Staff #2) changed the child's diaper and then the parent rang the doorbell and they left right away, so I didn't get a chance to check the diaper that day”.
Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted by LPA, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 12 & chapter 1), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days.
Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of
$100.
An exit interview conducted, and the report was reviewed with Licensee, Jasmine Ortega.
Page 2 of 2 |