1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA conducted interviews with child 1 (C1 thru 5), who made disclosures. C1 and C3 were qualified; however, they did not want to speak further with the LPA. C2 and C4 were not qualified. C5 disclosed that, upon arrival to the facility, they’ve observed C6 with a dirty diaper. According to C5, the AM teacher (name unknown) would tell S2 to change C6 diaper. Per C5, the smell of a dirty diaper was strong; however, they didn’t know for how long C6s diaper was dirty and not changed by AM teacher(s). LPA conducted interviews with parent 1 (P1 thru 7), who made disclosures. According to P1, P2, and P3 they have no concerns regarding diaper changes since they’ve never observed their children with a dirty diaper or rash. According to P5, C7 was picked up from the facility earlier than usual when C7 told P5 that they had a diaper full of poop. P5 changed C7s diaper at the facility and seemed like it was never changed because C7 had burn marks on the side of the thigh. P5 immediately told the teacher (name unknown); however, staff was fired. The second incident occurred with S3 who is still at the facility. P5 observed that C7 had a diaper rash and elevated their concern with the licensee’s sister. Per P5, since speaking with the licensee’s sister there hasn’t been any more incidents. Interviews with P1 and P5 revealed that they are aware of the facility documenting diaper changes. Per P5, the diaper log was requested when the second dirty diaper incident occurred and observed that the diaper log stated that S3 changed C7s diaper at 2:22pm; however, P5 recalled picking up C7 at 2:00pm and changed their dirty diaper at the facility. P2 and P3 deny receiving a diaper log. LPA could not get in contact P4. P6 and P7 did not return LPAs phone call.
During LPAs inspection on 11/08/24 and 11/15/24, LPA observed the facility has a changing table, Clorox wipes to disinfect the area, gloves, and a sign with diaper change procedures. The diaper change area was clean, and LPA took pictures. LPA conducted children’s files reviews and did not observe diaper logs on file. LPA took a picture of a diaper log sample. Upon request to review previous diaper logs, S1 stated that the facility does not keep copies because the originals are given to parents.
Based on interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, the following deficiencies are being cited (see attached 9099D).
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with licensee Jose Romero.
Page 3 of 3 |