1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Per S2, the area was sprayed about 3 times since January 2025. LPA P. Ochoa attempted to interview Child 1 (C1), however child was unable to respond to questions relating to the use of spray in the home during nap time. LPA P. Ochoa also interviewed Parent 1 (P1) who although is very happy with the daycare services, are unaware if the facility uses or has used a spray to relax the children for nap time.
Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
Based on the LPA’s observations and record review, the following deficiencies listed on the attached LIC 809D (deficiency page) are being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 22. Deficiencies that are being cited need to be cleared to protect the children’s health and safety.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days during facility’s hours of operation. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was provided to Licensee, Melissa Rivera Carreras.
Page 2 of 2 |