1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The menu includes options for breakfast, lunch, and dinner, as well as alternative choices for lunch and dinner. Staff #4 (S4) mentioned that meals are nutritious, featuring balanced portions of protein, fruits, vegetables, and grains. (S4) also noted that (R1) is not on a special diet but prefers the BRAT diet, which consists of easily digestible foods. (S4) explained that (R1) frequently adjusts the daily menu, and these requests are always accommodated made before 10 AM. Additionally, (S4) affirmed that there are no concerns regarding portion sizes, assuring that every resident is always welcome to request second helpings. (S4) mentioned that (R1) receives a prepared sack lunch at no cost during weekly outings with Welbe Health. Both (S2) and (S4) reported that residents occasionally request Tray Service, which incurs a fee of $6. (R1) is escorted to the dining area for meals but sometimes prefers to eat in the room, which requires Tray Service and results to a charge. According to (S1) and (S2), (R1) is aware of this fee, as it is outlined in the Resident Manual provided to all residents and discussed during the Resident Council Meetings.
On March 4, 2025, between 10:35 AM and 2:55 PM, the Department interviewed all seven resident members, referred to as Resident #1 through Resident #7. Six (6) out of the seven (7) residents could not validate the claim in question. They reported that the meals were sufficient in portion sizes, with alternative options available, and that second helpings can be requested. All residents confirmed their understanding of the Tray Service fee, which is outlined in the Resident Manual, or mentioned that staff would be reminded them about this service fee.
(R1) mentioned that the meal portions were small but noted that they could request second helpings if needed. (R1) preferred not to eat breakfast and was aware of the available snacks. (R1) expressed uncertainty about the Tray Service fee, estimating it to be around $5 per tray. Additionally, (R1) indicated to be on a BRAT diet and that the kitchen staff would accommodate (R1's) dietary requests.
(W2) reported that (R1), a former resident of the facility, expressed concerns about the quality of the meals, the adequacy of the services, and the comfort of the seating arrangements. (R1) emphasized the need for improved dining options and more attentive assistance from the staff.
A reviewed the facility's Resident Manual, dated 12/20/23, which mentions meal tray service on page 3. The List of Alternative Options for Lunch and Dinner, dated 09/2024, and the Facility Menu, dated 03/04/25, displayed that the facility provides alternative meal choices and healthy, balanced meals. The Department checked the food inventory, both non-perishable and perishable, and confirmed it met Title 22 Regulations. Additionally, an inspection of lunch portions found that a bowl of beef vegetable soup, a half crab cake on a roll, coleslaw, and vanilla ice cream for dessert appeared to be sufficient.
Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C
|