1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (continued pg2)
the vehicle parked next to R1s car had damages that matched damages on R1’s vehicle. R2 denies hitting anything during the time it was being moved in the alley. Staff denies hitting anything during the time the vehicle was being moved from the alley to the garage.
-Regarding: Staff did not prevent resident from engaging in inappropriate activities. RP indicates that R2 should have not been allowed to operate R1’s vehicle due to physical condition. On 4/4/2022 LPA Cardenas reviewed R2s physician report Resident has no dementia, none auditory or visual impairment, not confused or disoriented, able to follow instructions and able to leave facility unattended. During interview with R3 and Staff#1, they both indicated that R2 volunteered to move R1s vehicle. Staff#1 indicates that none of the staff asked R2 to move the vehicle. Staff#1 indicated that R2 refused to get out of the vehicle after resident was having difficulty operating it. R2 didnt want to allow Staff to move it from the alley to the garage until after a few pleas from staff.
-Regarding: Staff did not medically assess resident after incident- LPA interviewed R1, resident indicates that R2 denies hitting anything during the time resident was operating the vehicle. LPA interviewed R3 who denies that R2 hit anything during the time R2 was operating the vehicle. Sttaff#1 indicates that during the time R2 was operating the vehicle there was a loud noise as if there was some impact and the vehicle hit something. R2 broke really hard and staff could hear the tires against the pavement, Staff#1 saw R2 slightly move forward as if there was impact. Staff#1 indicates that R2 was asked if everything was okay, R2 indicated he was okay. LPA asked if staff confirmed that there was actual impact, Staff#1 is unable to confirm if there was any actual impact or damage to the vehicle, staff didn’t check the vehicle for damages during the time R2 operated vehicle.
-Regarding Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings, during interview with adminstratrator, it was indicated that if there is any damages/losses facility will discuss with resident. At this time R1 has not been available to sit down and discuss next steps. LPA was unable to find anything outlined in the admission agreement regarding damages to personal property such as vehicle. R3 indicated that the garage has signs posted that the facility is not liable for any damages.
-Regarding Staff did not notify resident of incident to personal belongings. On 4/4/2022 LPA interviewed R1 who indicates that facility didn’t notify of damages to vehicle, resident heard it from the owner of the vehicle that was parked next to R1s vehicle. LPA asked the date he was told about the damages, resident
|