1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Residents have no knowledge of any attack by R2 on R1 but did hear about the supposed attack that happened. On 02/09/2023 LPA Calderon interviewed S1 for complaint. S1 states that case worker informed S1 of R2 attacking R1 in R1 room. S1 states that R2 has no history of being aggressive with staff or other residents prior to the incident. S1 states that S1 understands that R2 entered R1 room, and a fight started. S1 does not know who started the fight but does acknowledge that R2 did not have permission to enter R1 room and no fight would have started if R2 had not gone into R1 room. On 02/09/2023 LPA Calderon interviewed S2-S3 for complaint. S2 states that S2 does not know of any fight between R1 and R2. S3 states that S3 was called to help with an incident that happened in R1 room. S3 states that S3 does not know who started the fight but S3 did see R2 pulling at R1 legs trying to pull R1 off R1 bed and did see R1 kicking at R2 direction. S3 called the police but the police did not come to the scene. S3 states that S3 did not see any resident punch the other resident. On 02/09/2023 LPA Calderon reviewed R2 facility file, R2 does not suffer from mental health issues or have anger issues. On 02/09/2023 LPA Calderon reviewed facility house rules, appears R2 may be in violation of rules 1,3,5,6 and 9
Based on LPA Calderon observations and interviews which were conducted and the records that were reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted and copy of the Complaint Report and Appeal Rights were provided to the Administrator (S1).
|