1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on interviews with S1-S2 and R1, the eviction notice that R1 was served did not indicate a reason for the proposed eviction. Also, R1 was served the eviction notice personally even though R1 has a Power of Attorney that handles all legal documentation for R1.
Based on LPA Brown’s observations, the records that were reviewed (eviction notice, power of attorney information), and the interviews that were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be substantiated.
A telephonic exit interview was conducted with Administrator Sherrina Lewis, and an electronic copy was provided via email for signature. |