1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ALLEGATION: Facility staff harassing resident.
Investigation revealed the following: Based on record review, R1 was admitted to the facility on 4/16/2014. Preplacement Appraisal dated 4/6/2014 shows R1 has symptoms of Major Depression and Bipolar Disorder. Medication Record Administration (MAR) dated 7/2020 indicates R1 is currently taking one tablet of Quetiapine Fumarate 200 mg by mouth twice a day for Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder and Depression. Training record dated 7/2/2020 shows facility provides monthly training to Staff on ‘Abuse and Neglect in the Elder Care Setting”, “Respecting Residents Rights” and “Respecting Diversity: Resident, staff and families”.
The Department conducted interviews with Staff (S1- S7) and Residents (R1- R10) from this facility. R1 alleged that S1 verbally harassed her. R1 stated S1 discriminated her based on her race about two years ago. R1 demanded that S1 must apologize to her before the presence of R1’s superior (S7) and be suspended for three months without pay. S7 denied that S1 harassed R1 and he reported that he does not tolerate any act of harassment in the facility. S1 who is the alleged perpetrator denied the allegation. S1 indicated in the interview that she had no clue about this issue and when she heard about it from S7, she attempted to appease R1 but she avoided her in all her attempts. S1-S7 stated no residents have been discriminated or harassed by any facility staff. Interviews with R2-R10 indicated residents are treated with dignity and respect. Based on observation, record review and interviews with S1-S7 and R2-R10, information obtained do not corroborate that S1 harassed R1.
Based on information gathered, LPA did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegation, “Facility staff harassing resident”. This is evidenced by LPA’s observations, interviews and record review.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the complaint investigation of the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiency is cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22.
A telephonic exit interview was conducted with Licensee/Administrator Seth Bienstock, and an electronic copy was sent via email for signature. |