1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued LIC812-C page 2
Allegation #1: Resident not being provided adequate food service
Staff 1-3 (S1-S3) interviewed stated they had two clients and currently have one client and both clients were provided adequate food service. S1-S3 stated the clients are getting plenty of food to eat, three (3) meals per day plus snacks, breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks daily. LPA Bunker was unable to interview C1 he is non-verbal. S1-S3 stated the allegation is false.
Allegation #2: Facility not clean
Staff 1-3 (S1-S3) interviewed stated the facility is cleaned daily. We toured the facility and did not observe any cluttered. The entire facility has hardwood floors throughout the home. We did not observe any carpet on the floors. S1-S3 denied the allegation.
Investigation revealed the following: Staff 1-3 (S1-S3) interviewed stated the allegations are all false. LPA was informed by the administrator there is only one client currently in placement. C1 was at his adult day program and is nonverbal. The facility had plenty of meat, chicken, chicken patties, beef, steak, ground beef hamburger patties, pork, pork chops, fish, fish sticks, turkey, hot dogs, lunch meat, cold cuts, pizza, beans, peas, canned vegetables, fruit cups, peanut butter, milk, eggs, cheese, yogurt, bread, cereals, rice, noodles, pasta, potato, grain, crackers, nuts, chips, cookies, canned food, fresh fruits, fresh vegetables, sweets, desserts, juice, water, etc. LPA Bunker observed an ample supply of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and fresh perishable foods for a minimum of two days. Staff 1-3 (S1-S3) interviewed stated the facility is cleaned daily. During the tour of the facility, there was no cluttered. The entire facility has hardwood floors throughout the home, and there was no carpet on any of the floors. The facility was clean, safe, sanitary, and in good repair at the time of the visit. S1-S3 denied the allegation.
Based on interviews, available evidence, observation, information received, and records reviewed there was not enough sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated.
There were no deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. |