1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | They reported the incidents to the administrator and licensee, but both ignored their complaints. S#3 did not see or hear anything. R#2, R#4, R#5, & R#6, stated that they heard S#4 scream at R#1 but they did not see S#4 grab R#1 arm. Later R#1 showed them R#1’s arm with the bruises. Witness #1 stated that they had seen the bruises on R#1 arm that were caused by S#4. The administrator stated that they had suspended S#4 temporarily an admitted that R#1 and R#3 reported the incident but administrator thought that R#1 was making up the incident and that R#1 had come with the bruises from R#1 previous facility. The interviews conducted concur with the above allegation.
Allegation #2 – Staff mishandled a resident while in care. Interviews conducted with S#2, stated they witness S#4 chase R#1 around the kitchen and throw a chair at R#1 but missed R#1. Interviews with R#1 and R#3, stated that S#4 always screams and yells at them all the time. They have reported the incidents to the administrator and licensee, but both ignored their complaints. S#3 did not see or hear anything. R#2, R#4, R#5, & R#6, stated that they heard S#4 scream and chase R#1 in the kitchen but did not witness incident. The administrator stated that they had suspended S#4 temporarily an admitted that R#1 and R#3 reported the incident but administrator thought that R#1 was making up the incident and that R#1 had come with the bruises from R#1 previous facility. The interviews conducted concur with the above allegation
Allegation #3 – Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident while in care. The interview with the Administrator, stated that they saw the bruises, but did not call 911 because, she believed that they were old bruises, that R#1 came with from another facility. That’s why they did not seek medical attention for R#1. Interviews with S#2, S#3, R#2 – R#6, they stated that knew nothing about getting medical help for R#1. The interviews conducted concur with the above allegation.
Based on LPA’s observations and interviews which were conducted and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated.
According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), LPA observed the following deficiencies and issued citations.
An exit interview conducted with Felicidad Ison, Care Giver. a hard copy report provided along with the Appeals rights. |