1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on the LPA's investigation, the investigation revealed the following. For Allegation #1 – Staff caused injuries to a resident while in care. The interviews conducted with the Administrator and S#2, they stated that they did hear, but did not see S#4, when S#4 screamed and chased R#1 around the kitchen. R#1 & R#3, stated that S#4 hits them and screams at them. They reported to administrator and licensee, but both ignored their complaints. S#3 did not see or hear anything. R#2, R#4, R#5, & R#6, stated that they heard S#4 scream and chase R#1 in the kitchen and that R#1, showed them R#1 arm with bruises, but they didn’t see the incident, just heard it. Witness #1 stated that they seen the bruises on R#1 arm that were caused by S#4. . The administrator stated that they had suspended S#4 temporarily. The interviews conducted concur with the above allegation.
Allegation #2 – Staff mishandled a resident while in care. The interviews conducted with the Administrator and S#2, they stated that they did hear, but did not see S#4, scream and chase R#1 around the kitchen. R#1 & R#3, stated that S#4 hits them and screams at them. They reported to administrator and licensee, but both ignored their complaints. S#3 did not see or hear anything. R#2, R#4, R#5, & R#6, stated that they heard S#4 scream and chase R#1 in the kitchen and that R#1, showed them R#1 arm with bruises, but they didn’t see the incident, just heard it. The administrator stated that they had suspended S#4 temporarily. The interviews conducted concur with the above allegation.
Allegation #3 – Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident while in care. The interview with the Administrator, stated that they saw the bruises, but did not call 911 because, she believed that they were old bruises, that R#1 came with from another facility. That’s why they did not seek medical attention for R#1. Interviews with S#2, S#3, R#2 – R#6, they stated that knew nothing about getting medical help for R#1. The interviews conducted concur with the above allegation.
Based on LPA’s observations and interviews which were conducted and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated.
According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), LPA observed the following deficiencies and issued citations.
An exit interview was conducted with Hazel Magalona, and a hard copy was provided and Appeal Rights.
|