1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on the LPA's investigation, the investigation revealed the following. For Allegation #1 – Staff hit residents. The interviews conducted with the Administrator & S#2, stated that they have never seen S#4 hit any resident. They have only heard S#4 scream at residents. They reported to administrator and licensee, but both ignored their complaints. S#3, stated that she had just gotten there, she doesn’t know anything about S#4. Interviews with R#1, R#2, R#3, & R#4, stated that they have witnessed when S#4 would yell at R1, they have never seen S#4 hit R#1 or any other resident. The administrator stated that they had suspended S#4 temporarily. The interviews conducted concur with the above allegation.
Allegation #2 - Facility food quality is not nutritional. The interviews conducted with the administrator, S#2, & S#3, they all stated that the food is good and nutritional. They residents only ask for the same food: Hamburgers and hot dogs. Interviews with R#1 – R#6, stated that all they give them is hamburgers and hot dogs. Sometimes they will give them something different, but basically hamburgers and hot dogs. LPA Soto reviewed the menu; it is nutritional and offers a variety of food, but they were not following the menu. The interviews conducted concur with the above allegation.
Based on LPA’s observations and interviews which were conducted and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated.
According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), LPA observed the following deficiencies and issued citations.
An exit interview was conducted with Melanie Tallada, and a hard copy was provided along with Appeal rights. |