1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff failed to meet residents’ needs.
The details of the complaint state staff failed to meet the resident's needs. According to the complainant, it is not the care that is the issue, (R1) is not granted dignity and respect at this facility. Interviews with (R1-R3) reported the staff is kind and respectful to all the residents. Interviews with (S1-S5) dispute this claim and state staff have mandated training on how to address residents' needs. (S1-S5) all verified that it is (R1) who is critical and will often cause attention to oneself with other residents. An interview with (R1) did not have comments to add and stated that the management staff has been unkind. (R1) did not have specific dates, times, and a witness who could collaborate on her statement. An interview with (W2) states she has observed the staff at this facility grants(R1) dignity and respect. Based on the information collected, there is no evidence to support the allegation mentioned above.
Based on information gathered, an inspection of the facility, observation, analysis of service records, and interviews conducted, the Department found no evidence to support the allegations listed on this complaint report.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations, did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Remon Pagels and a copy of the report was provided. |