1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to (S1), (R1) had prior concerns with roommates over privacy and personal items tampered. During an interview with (R7) a former roommate, she reported (R1) had accused her of taking (R1's) Bible. (R7) claims her name was written inside the book and found there is no evidence of her accusation. (S1) claims due to (R1's) concerns, management took actions to accommodate (R1) by transferring her from four (4) shared rooms to now one (1) private room within a year residency at this facility.
It is alleged this facility is not allowing (R1) to have private phone calls. An interview with (R1) states she is unable to have private conversations on her personal cellular phone. (R1) states she gets noise interference while she is on a call and assumes someone is hacking her calls to retrieve her information. (R1) states she is not certain who is hacking her phone device but does acknowledge it may also be a poor connection while on a private call. (R1) is unable to give detailed information to support her assertion as she claims it is a suspicion on her part. An interview with (S1-S4) all claimed that residents are given their privacy to incoming calls. Aside from residents' personal cellular phones, residents have access to a wireless phone located in the medication room and can utilize remotely within the facility. Each resident is given their privacy to accept in any location of the facility and that no staff member interferes with any calls. Interviews were conducted with (R2-R10) all claim they have no concerns conducting private communications while inside the facility.
The Department interviewed (R1’s) former administrator, case manager, and family member (W1-W3) all claimed (R1) has the propensity to be over concern and overly suspicious of others. All of them have stated that (R1) has the inclination to reprise these same allegations from the past.
Based on information gathered, the Department did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegations: “Facility staff falsified resident’s records”, “Facility staff did not safeguard resident’s personal property”, “Facility staff is not allowing residents to have private phone calls”.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not enough preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged allegations are valid did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are "unsubstantiated.”
A telephonic exit interview was conducted with Ginger Enriquez, and a hard copy was provided via email for signature. |