1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | EVALUATION REPORT CONTINUES
(S2) claims that medical records were not made accessible to the complainant and that only the release of resident medical information is made available to the authorized representative for (R1). A review of service records indicates that (W1) power of attorney is the only authorized representative for (R1) on file.
The complainant added concerns for (R1's) hygiene and claims that during an in-person visit on 07/07/22, she noticed (R1) seemed unkempt and did not appear to be groomed. During the investigation, the Department observed (R1) in a presentable appearance. (R1) appeared well groomed and did not exude an unpleasant odor. A review of (R1's) daily monitoring of ADLs and progress notes indicates that (R1) is being cared for on an hourly basis.
According to (W1) power of attorney for (R1) claims this is all a misunderstanding. (W1) describes that there is an ongoing litigation with family members over (R1's) guardianship.
Based on information gathered, an inspection of the facility, observation, analysis of (R-1)'s service records, and interviews conducted, the Department found no evidence to support the allegations mentioned in this complaint.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations, did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
No deficiencies were cited during this visit.
An exit interview conducted with Ginger Enriquez, and a copy of the report was provided. |