1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was alleged that staff does not safeguard belonging in the event resident is unable to defend property from being stolen or damage. On 2/16/23, LPA conducted interview with R1, stated when leaves the facility staff doesn’t lock the bedroom door and may leave open. R1 is afraid belongings will come up missing. During interviews with resident, 3 out of 10 stated they had belongings stolen. Also, 9 out of 10 residents stated staff will lock the doors and doesn’t leave room doors open and have no concerns. Interviews with Administrator and staff S2-S3 stated they lock the bedroom doors when leaving. All staff stated there has not been any reports of stolen items. LPA did not observe bedrooms open unless residents were in them or coming out. LPA reviewed Theft Policy procures. Based on interviews conducted and file reviews the above allegation unsubstantiated.
Regarding allegation #2: Staff did not keep objectionable laundry noises out of reach of resident areas.
It was alleged that facility laundry room makes loud noises in resident’s area. On 2/16/23, LPA conducted interview with R1, stated laundry room is very loud and is awaken out of sleep. During interviews with 9 residents, all stated they their laundry is picked up during the day and doesn’t have any concerns of laundry rooms noise at night or heard any complaints. Interview with Administrator and staff S2-3 stated housekeeping does laundry in the 2nd room during the day and caregivers do laundry at night from 11pm-2AM. During interview Administrator had suggested to change R1 room to accommodate and refused. LPA observed 2 Laundry rooms and the 2nd one was in use. R1 is located next to the 1 laundry room that was not being used. LPA observed residents cleaning schedule. Based on interviews conducted and file reviews the above allegation unsubstantiated.
Based on interviews conducted and records review, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, and a hard copy was provided
|