1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (R1) claimed not to have agreed with management for this move. (R1) is unaware of why (R1) was sent back to the hospital and why (R1) has not been released back to the facility. (R1) claimed the bed sores were healing and verified that (R1) was on home health for wound care.
On 06/19/24 between 10:30 am – 12:00 pm, the Department interviewed (2) out of (2) staff #1 - #2 who verified the reason for (R1) requiring medical emergency assistance at Kaiser Permanente Medical on 06/12/24 and 06/17/24. (S1) claimed that (R1) needed wound assessment for (R1)’s bedsores. (S1) claimed that (R1) required a higher level of care but did not receive medical evaluation from the hospital that (R1) had prohibited health conditions that would prevent (R1) to return at Santa Fe Care Home. (S2) indicated that (R1) exhibited contentious behavior that law enforcement was dispatched on 06/16/24, and it was deemed that (R1) required psychological assessment at the hospital. (S2) claimed that (R1) exhibited challenging behaviors in the past at Santa Fe Care Homes and that (R1) would benefit from a skilled nursing facility. (S2) expressed that (R1) had received an Eviction Notice from Santa Fe Home but was not able to provide a copy of the notice sent to Community Care Licensing for approval. (S2) had refused to accept (R1) to return to the facility based on the conditions for eviction that (R1) requires a higher level of care. Medical records indicated (R1) psychiatric behavior is normal.
On 06/19/24 between 10:30 am – 12:00 pm, the Department interviewed (2) out of (2) residents #2 - #3 at Golden Assisted Living both verified that (R1) did not cause any disruption at the facility and did not observe (R1) in exhibited unsafe behavior toward staff or residents.
Based on the information provided the facility failed to provide to (CCL) confirmation receipt that an Eviction Notice was sent. The El Segundo Regional Office (CCL) had no records on file. The facility failed to follow up with (CCL) for approval as written in Title 22 Regulations Section 87224 Eviction Procedures. (S1-S2) failed to follow up and contact the Department to inform an Eviction Notice was issued to (R1). (S2) failed to provide a copy of the notice. Interviews and records reviews support the above allegation.
Based on the Department's observation and interviews, records reviews, and analysis, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation of “Illegal Eviction" is Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099-D.
An exit interview was conducted with Anqelic Gradney. The Rights were discussed with Anqelic Gradney and a copy of Appeals Procedures for Licensees was provided, as well as a copy of this report. |