1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff did not prevent a client from attacking another client
The complainant alleges that staff is not preventing clients from attacking each other. LPA reviewed an incident report in which there was an altercation on 7/14/24 between two clients. During interviews, LPA learned that C1 was unable to sleep due to psych episodes of C2, their roommate. C1 tried to report their frustration with C2 to S3. C1 became aggressive verbally and physically towards client and staff. C1 is legally blind and could not recall the roommates name. C1 began swinging their walking cane striking S3 as S3 tried to defuse the situation by separating both clients as witnessed by C5. Per C5, C1 did not know who was who as he was just trying to defend himself. The police were called by staff and staff was advised to separate the roommates by changing their rooms.
LPA Shirley interviewed staff 1-3 (S1-S3), and asked, does staff prevent a client from attacking another client? Of those interviewed, 3 out of 3 answered yes. LPA Shirley interviewed clients 1-6 (C1-C6). LPA ask, does staff prevent a client from attacking another client. Of those interviewed, 4 out of 6 answered yes.
Based on information gathered, the department did not find sufficient evidence to support allegation of, "Staff did not prevent a client from attacking another client”. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the LIC 9099 was provided to Administrator, Carliss Monroe.
|