1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on the LPA's investigation, the investigation revealed the following:
For Allegation 1 – Facility staff are withholding resident(s) mail. Interviews conducted with S#1 – S#10, communicated that the mail is sorted and distributed daily. Facility has a sheet that shows which resident can get mail personally and which resident has their family member receive the mail for them. In the Memory Care Unit – Connection side the mail is given to the resident directly by the manager. In the Haven side- the mail is giving to manager and the manager’s give it to the assistants which open and read the mail for the resident. LPA reviewed the letter of who’s allowed to received mail directly and whom has it picked up by family member. LPA also reviewed the Residents roster which also shows who get mail and who doesn’t. Interviews conducted with R#1 – R#10, communicated that they all get their mail. The mail hasn’t been withheld by staff or it hasn’t gone missing either. The interviews and records reviewed do not concur with the above allegation.
Allegation 2 - Facility administrator does not spend a sufficient amount of time at the facility. The interviews conducted with S#1, communicated that he is always at the facility. If he is not in his office, it’s because he is making his rounds around the facility. The only time is not at the facility is when his on vacation or a business trip. In those instances, he will notify all the staff, residents, and family members that he will not be available, and leave the contact information of the person taking over for him. S#2 - S#10, communicated that Robert May is always at that facility 5 days a week. He is always making his rounds in the facility. Helping staff, residents and speaking to family members. His always available when needed. Even on his days off, the staff, residents, and family members can get a hold of him by cell phone. Interviews with R#1 – R#10, communicated that they see the Executive Director, but they really haven’t needed him or needed his help. So, they feel his there enough at the facility. LPA review executive Director’s work week schedule. It showed his there at the facility enough time to oversee facility. The interviews conducted and records reviewed do not concur with the above allegation.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated
An exit interview was conducted with Robert May, Executive Director and a hard copy of report was provided.
|