1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Investigator(s) Dennis Douglas and Investigator Lozano asked S3 if S3 has ever used any illegal drugs in the past. S3 stated he had not. Investigator(s) Dennis Douglas and Investigator Lozano inspected the area and did not observe or detect any signs of illegal drugs on the premise.
On 12/09/22, Investigator(s) Dennis Douglas conducted a visit to one of S3 previous places of employment., Investigator(s) Dennis Douglas and Investigator Lozano made contact with, House Manager, Collateral Contact 3 (CC3). I explained to (CC3) that was there to ask him some questions regarding previous employee/suspect, S3. (CC3) confirmed that S3 was indeed a previous employee at the facility and that (CC3) worked with (CC3). (CC3) advised that S3 worked at the facility for approximately 5 years. I asked (CC3) why S3 no longer works at facility. (CC3) explained S3 sought a new job after S3 hours were decreasing. (CC3) advised that 3 of the six total clients currently at the facility were clients at the time S3 worked there. However, (CC3) advised that the 3 remaining clients were all non-verbal with Dementia. During my interview with Augustin, inquired about S3’s interaction with the clients during his time of employment. (CC3) stated he [S3] was “okay” with the clients. (CC3) advised me S3 treated the clients nicely. (CC3) stated there were no complaints of S3 regarding any mistreatment of clients at the facility. (CC3) described S3 as “a good person.” (CC3) was asked if there was ever suspicion of drug use with S3. (CC3) stated there was not. During interview with (CC3), CC3 was asked if he would hire S3 back. (CC3) informed, (CC3) would.
On 01/26/22, Investigator(s) Dennis Douglas attempt was made, via telephone, to contact C2 responsible party, received an automated voice mailbox, left a message requesting a call back. Investigators receive no return call from C2 responsible party.
On 01/26/22, Investigator(s) Dennis Douglas attempt to contact, via telephone, who is the responsible party of facility client, C5. However, I received an automated voice mailbox. I left a message requesting a call back. Investigators did not receive return call from C2 responsible party.
On 01/27/22, Investigator(s) Dennis Douglas attempted to contact, via telephone, Sean Hong, responsible party
facility client, C1. However, I received an automated voice mailbox. I left a message requesting a callback.
Investigators did not receive return call from .C1
On 01/27/23, Investigator(s) Dennis Douglas called that Embrace Healthcare agency and spoke with Director of Nursing, Collateral Contact 4 (CC4).. It was explained to Collateral Contact 4 (CC4) that our department was conducting an allegation into suspected physical abuse of clients at the Alternative Residential Care facility in the city of Torrance. Collateral Contact 4 (CC4) confirmed their agency provides care for facility client, C3.
Collateral Contact 4 (CC4) informed Investigator(s) Dennis Douglas their agency has never had any suspicion of abuse of the clients at Alternative Residential Care facility by facility staff. |