1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued LIC9099-C page 2
LPA Bunker requested a copy of the personnel report, and resident roster, and reviewed the resident files, including the physician's report, medical records, admission agreement, identification and emergency information, medication records, medication administration records (MARs), medication logs, medical assessments, consent forms, incident reports, appraisal & needs service plan. LPA Bunker requested copies of supporting documents. S1-S2 stated that R1 handles its own medications and medical appointments.
Allegation #1: Staff did not ensure that a resident’s incontinence needs were met
Interviews with staff members S1-S3 (S1-S3) stated that there was no indication in R1's medical records that R1 was experiencing incontinence need. S1-S3 stated that R1 was not receiving incontinence assistance per the resident's needs and services plan. S1-S3 stated that R1’s undergarments were dry, and there was no evidence of R1 sitting in urine overnight. S1-S3 stated that R1 does not receive one-on-one care and that R1 had accidentally fallen after sliding from her bed, which was positioned low to the floor as per the resident’s preference. S1-S3 stated that prior to the fall, staff had just left R1’s room, and R1 was doing well.
Shortly after the fall, a family member called to inform staff. While S3 was still on the phone with the family member, S3 proceeded to R1’s room to provide assistance, and staff promptly called for additional help. The Care Manager responded immediately. S3 stated that a complete body check was conducted for injuries, but at first, R1 refused the body check. Staff observed a discoloration on R1’s left leg. It was unclear whether the discoloration resulted from the fall or was present prior to the fall. S1-S3 stated that R1 reported feeling fine, declined hospital care, and refused medical treatment. S3 states that she and the Care Manager assisted R1 back to bed. The family, responsible party, and physician were promptly notified. S1-S3 emphasized that the fall could not have been prevented by staff. S1-S3 stated that they have maintained open communication with the family and their leadership team, including lengthy meetings lasting up to four hours. S1-S3 stated the facility operates 24/7, 365 days a year, ensuring resident safety at all times.
Allegation #2: Staff do not answer a resident's call button in a timely manner
S1-S3 stated staff consistently respond to residents’ call buttons in a timely manner. The facility adheres to a 10-minute response window or less for assisting residents once a call is placed, whether via the call button or pendant. S1-S3 stated it did not take an hour to help the resident. S1-S3 stated that S3 was in the resident's room when the resident was on the phone with her family member. S1-S3 stated that S3 did respond to the resident's pendant alarm promptly. R2-R7 stated that staff always answer a resident's call button in a timely manner. S1-S3 and R2-R7 denied the allegation. See continued LIC9099-C page 3 |