1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On July 30, 2025, at approximately 2:00 pm, during an interview with witnesses (W#1-W#2), (2) out of (2) stated that the times they come and visit their family at the facility, they have never experienced the elevator door closing on them quickly.
On July 30, 2025, at approximately 3:00 PM, during an interview with the elevator technician (E#1), they explained the operation of the elevator's door system. The elevator has a built-in timer that allows the door to remain open for approximately 10 seconds after closing. If someone needs to hold the door for another person to enter, the door can remain open for up to 20 seconds. After this time, the door will attempt to close, bypassing the infrared sensors until it shuts completely. If the door does not close completely, it will reopen and shut off the electrical system until a technician can reboot it. LPA Iniguez inquired whether there are any safety hazards associated with the elevator door closing on someone. (E#1) reassured that there are no safety hazards, as the force exerted by the door is less than 15 pounds, which complies with state regulations.
During this investigation, LPA did not find sufficient evident to support the above-mentioned allegation(s).
Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above-mentioned allegation(s) are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was given to JIM Howland/Executive Director.
|