1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from page 2
S2 toured the exits of facility with LPA during unannounced visit, at the time of inspection there was no bolt present in any of the exit doors. LPA and S2 did observe a hole drilled into the push bar of one of the door releases on the bottom floor, (S/W exit door La Tijera Street), however there was no obstruction, the door operated without resistance for egress. S2 stated that he never noticed the hole since he has been employed more than a year. LPA interviewed staff (3-9) regarding complaint, all denied the allegation Facility emergency door is locked with a bolt. All staff interviewed denied ever seeing the door locked or locked with a bolt or having a problem with egressing from the building. Staff members 3 through 9 denied the allegation.
Findings
Based on information gathered, the department did not find sufficient evidence to support allegation Facility emergency door is locked with a bolt.
The Department’s investigation consisted of an inspection of the facility, observation, analysis of facility records and interviews conducted and found insufficient evidence to support the allegations:Facility emergency door is locked with a bolt. The allegations may have happened or are valid, however there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations, did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Jacqueline Vu Business Office Manager. and a hard copy was provided.
|