1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from being assaulted two (2) times while in care
The reporting party stated that R1 has been assaulted by R2 two (2) times in the past four (4) months. Reporting party stated the family was informed by the facility that R2 was going to be separated from R1. Additionally, reporting party stated that the family was informed that precautions were going to be in place to ensure another incident didn’t occur.
The investigation reveals that a resident, R2, assaulted another resident, R1, after more than once entering or attempting to enter R2’s room. The facility assured the families that staff would closely supervise R1 and R2. In the last incident, R1 was again assaulted by R2 which led to R1 being hospitalized. R2 believed that R1 was attempting to break into their room again. LPA reviewed video of the incident and video of the staff during the time of the incident, LPA saw that S1 was not monitoring R1 as they walked back to their room to ensure they found the correct room. LPA conducted a file review for R1 that states R1, for mobility, requires assistance due to poor eyesight. Additionally, R1’s cognitive needs states R1 requires re-direction to their room or to activities due to a history of R1 entering other resident’s rooms.
Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 8) are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Jodi Kanowitz, and a copy of this report was provided. |