1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During an interview with (S#1), LPA asked S#1 questions regarding how often they take training. S#1 stated that every month, but LPA noticed (S#1) could not understand the question, LPA had to repeat it four times. In addition, LPA started to see that S#1 did not understand the context of the questions; LPA tried to dissect the questions, but still, (S#1) could not answer the questions. At this moment, LPA had to finish the interview and document the event.
During interviews with staff (S#2-S#4), 3 out of 3 stated that they take their training on Relias. Relias has training modules with an expiration date. In addition, 3 out of 3 can communicate with the residents and need help understanding what the residents say to them. On the other hand, 2 out of 3 staff stated that S#1 has a language barrier that prevents them from communicating with the residents properly.
During interviews with residents (R#1-R#4), 4 out of 4 stated that the staff helps them with their basic needs and can communicate with the staff. Also, 4 out of 4 stated that they do not have problems understanding what the staff is telling them, and they do not know a staff member who cannot communicate with them.
During this investigation, LPA found did not find sufficient evident to support the above-mentioned allegation(s).
Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above-mentioned allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8).
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was given to Jody Kanowitz/Executive Director.
|