1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It is being alleged that a caregiver assaulted resident after caregiver was assaulted by resident.
On 02/12/25 at 9:40 am LPA conducted interview with S2 regarding the allegation above, S2 confirmed the allegation above and state it was reported that S1 was protecting self from R1. Per S2, S1 was asked to leave the facility when the incident was reported. On 02/12/25 from 10am-11am LPA conducted interview with S3-S6 regarding the allegation above, 4 of 4 staff interviewed denied the allegation above, 2 of 4 staff interviewed stated residents have reported the above allegation in the past and the allegation was reported to supervisor right away. On 02/12/25 at 11am LPA conducted interview with witness #1 (W1) regarding the allegation above. Per W1, W1 was notified of the allegation above by Avenir Memory Care at Westside. W1 reports there have not been any similar situations in the past with S1, however S1 will not return to Avenir Memory Care at Westside. On 02/12/25 from 11: 15 am-12:25pm LPA conducted interviews with residents #2-5 (R2-R5), 4 of 4 residents interviewed denied the allegation above and reported feeling safe at Avenir Memory Care at Westside. On 02/12/25 LPA was unable to interview resident #1 (R1) due to communication barriers. On 02/12/25 at 12:30pm LPA conducted interview with witness #2 (W2) regarding the allegation above, per W2 W2 was made aware of the incident right away, W2 continues to report there are no health or safety concerns regarding R1's care. On 02/12/25 at 12:45pm LPA conducted telephone interview with S1 regarding the allegation above, S1 confirmed the allegation above however per S1 the allegation was not intentional, as S1 was attempting to protect self. On 02/12/25 LPA reviewed unusual incident report regarding the allegation above, unusual incident report was submitted to the department on 02/07/25.
Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division (6) and Chapter (8)are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Exit interview conducted, appeal rights explained, and a copy of this report was provided. |