1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | At approximately 10:25 AM, LPA attempted to interview R1; however, R1 was unable to remain on topic and did not confirm or deny any falls, leading to the conversation being discontinued.
At 11:20 AM, LPA Allen also interviewed R1's responsible party, who stated that the facility’s administrative staff had been in direct communication regarding R1's falls and expressed confidence that staff were doing their best to ensure R1's safety.
A review of R1’s file showed no documented designation of R1 as a fall risk or a need for a one-to-one ratio, though assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) is required. Documentation of R1's incidents was also observed.
Additionally, during the visit, LPA Allen observed staff members actively providing care, engaging with residents, and redirecting individuals as needed. There was sufficient staffing at the time of the visit.
Based on interviews, file review and observation during the investigation, the above allegation is found to be Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and provided to Judy Kamenwa at conclusion of the visit. |