1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Allegation: Staff interfered with resident doing their own laundry. It is alleged that staff are prohibiting a resident from doing their own laundry despite there being no restriction or limitation preventing the resident from independently performing this task. On 04/20/26, the department conducted interviews with S1-S5. Of those interviewed, 5 out of 5 staff denied the allegation. An interview with S1 revealed that no resident, including R1 has informed them that they no longer wish to receive laundry services or that staff have denied them the ability to complete their own laundry. An interview with S2 revealed that staff follow a Resident Laundry Schedule, under which residents’ laundry is completed at least once per week. S2 stated that if a resident no longer wishes to receive laundry services, the resident must inform administration staff so that the residents name can be removed from the laundry schedule.
On 04/20/26, the department conducted interviews with R1-R6. Of those interviewed, 5 out of 6 residents could not corroborate the allegation. 5 out of 6 residents said they are satisfied with the services being provided to them.
On 04/20/2026, during a review of records, the Department did not identify any documented restriction or limitation preventing R1 from independently completing their own laundry. The Department also reviewed the facility’s Resident Laundry Schedule (updated 04/16/2026) and observed that resident laundry is completed at least once per week. Additionally, the Department observed that R1 is scheduled to receive laundry services on Fridays.
On 04/20/2026, the Department conducted a tour of the facility and observed a sign posted on the laundry room door indicating that residents and independent caregivers are permitted to do their own laundry on Sundays and Mondays between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
Based on observation, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Continued on LIC9099-C |