1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Facility failed to follow Covid-19 protocols.
LPA interviewed Virginia Zenteno, administrator, and Steven Aron, licensee, about the allegation. Both stated that the facility is in full compliance and are following the rules as specified in CCLD Pins, and the Department of Public Health guidelines. Both stated that the facility is isolating residents who have tested positive for Covid-19 and are not allowing them to roam outside of their isolation area.
Both stated that once a resident has a confirmed diagnosis, they are isolated from the other residents and strict protocols are put in place to keep them well, as well as keep the other residents and staff from getting the virus. LPA asked if there was a policy that mandated staff to deliver packages to the residents, both denied that, and stated that sometimes they do it as a courtesy, but residents pick up their own packages that have been delivered to them.
LPA interviewed S3-S6 about the allegation and all verified that they have been trained in Covid-19 protocols and that all residents who have the virus are isolated. They all denied the allegation that the facility failed to follow Covid-19 protocols. All staff are mandated to wear proper PPE’s and follow DPH as well as CCLD guidelines for Covid-19 prevention.
On 02/15/23, LPA reviewed the facilities mitigation plan, reporting logs for all staff and residents and the review of the records revealed that the facility are adhering to and keeping the required documents to track and report both staff/residents who have been infected with Covid-19.
LPA interviewed R1-R5 about the facilities protocols for Covid-19 prevention, and 5 out 5 corroborated that all staff continue to wear their PPE’s, Covid-19 residents are isolated, and all other required measures are utilized to prevent the spread of the virus.
Based on interviews and a records review, there was insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
No deficiencies cited.
An exit interview was conducted with Virginia Zenteno, Administrator, and a copy of the report was provided.
|