1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding Allegation: Facility staff does not serve nutritious meals.
This complaint alleged food could not be chewed, and rice and pasta are served repeatedly CCLD staff toured the facility to include the dining room around lunch time. Records review indicate: CCLD staff noted a daily menu on the tables and noted the facility kitchen had the 7 day and 2-day food supply on hand. Food served week of 7/7/24 to 7/13/2024 was breakfast items, various soups, chicken tacos, beef chill and fish items, and menu changes from week to week. Interviews indicate the following: 5 out of 5 staff indicate that the kitchen staff serve nutritious meals to residents. 6 out of 8 residents indicate that the food could be better, but the food served by staff are nutritious and taste fine.
Regarding Allegation: Residents barking dog is interfering with daily living of other residents.
This complaint alleged that R3 dog barks and interferes with other residents daily living. CCLD staff toured the facility to include common areas and R3 room. Record review indicate the following. Reviewed the admission agreement for the facility, page 10, section G 2 (pets), pets are allowed. Reviewed facility plans of operations page 6 “pet care” and resident handbook page 7 “pets”, are allowed by the facility. CCLD staff visited R3 room and noted small dog in a cage. Dog was not barking or making a sound. Knocked on R1 room door and noted there was no issue with dog barking. CCLD staff knocked on residents’ doors no one was home. Interviews indicate the following: 5 out of 5 staff indicate that the small dog does bark, but no resident has complained except R1. 6 out of 8 residents have no issues with R3 dog or R3 dog barking.
Based on interviews, observations, and supporting documentation, the preponderance of evidence standard has NOT been met; therefore, the allegations of “facility staff does not serve nutritious meals”, “residents barking dog is interfering with daily living of other residents”, is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted and copy of the Complaint Report were provided to the Manager Armida Uchiyama (S1)
|