1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | INVESTIGATION REVEALED THE FOLLOWING:
Allegation: Facility did not provide adequate supervision resulting in the resident physically abusing another resident in care.
It is alleged the facility failed to provide adequate supervision which resulted in a physical altercation between clients in care. According to the complaint client #1 (C1) was physically assaulted by client #2 (C2) and was bitten at the group home.
In an incident report received from the administrator staff #1 (S1) disclosed in written statement a group activity on 04/02/23. (C1) and (C2) were involved in a physical altercation which resulted in (C1) with injuries. (S1) reported that weekend group activities would involve clients from all (3) group homes. The clients in attendance included: (1) client from Acosta Family Home I, (2) clients from Acosta Family Home II, and (2) clients from Acosta Family Home III. During this activity, there were (3) employees on staff to provide care and supervision. (S1) reported that (C1) was sitting at the table doing activities, when suddenly (C2) sitting close by got upset and lunged and bit (C1) on the left forearm. (S1) stated that immediate medical attention was provided by (C1’s) primary physician and was provided with an antibiotic. (S1) stated she was not at the facility during the incident to supervise. An interview with (C1) disputes the location where the incident occurred, the staff members involved, the number of clients in attendance, and the number of injuries. (C1) claimed the incident with (C2) happened while outside the group home inside the van with only (C2) in the van. The van was parked outside Acosta Family Home III and staff #2 (S2) the only staff present went inside home with another client and left (C1) and (C2) unattended. (C1) claimed that (C2) punched (C1’s) face and bit (C1’s) on forearm and left scabs on left elbow and knee. (C1) unaware of what may have caused (C2) to react in this behavior and that no one witnesses the attack.
Interviews with staff #1, #2 and #3 (S1-S3) claimed the incident occurred while (C1) and (C2) both were at the dining table playing an activity. (S2) was in the kitchen preparing food, while (S3) was somewhere in the rear of the home preparing activities. Staff #4 (S4) who was also present on that day, stated the incident between (C1 and (C2) happened while watching television inside the living room with client #3 (C3). (C3) was interviewed and claimed to have not witnessed any altercations between clients. Interview with regional center service coordinator witness #1 (W1) and case manager witness #2 (C2) stated the incident was reported by (S1) and claimed that (C2) had a history of disruptive behavior but had no recent issues in months. (W1-W2) both verified that Acosta Family Home I & II are service level 2 and while Acosta Family Home III is classified as service level 4.
Evaluation Report continues on LIC-9099-C
|