| The investigation revealed the following:
Allegation: Staff do not provide adequate supervision, resulting in residents falling.
It is being reported that a former resident fell and staff did not report to the resident’s family right away. On 2/25/26, LPA Felisa Shirley reviewed a letter to Community Care Licensing Department, CCLD, LPM Stephanie Cifuentes dated 2/2/26, reporting a fall by a former resident in which staff treated the resident and called the resident’s emergency contact. Per interview with the facility Administrator, 2/25/26, she sent letter to LPA Shirley’s manager as she did not have the correct contact for LPA Shirley.
LPA interviewed staff 1 – staff 3 (S-1 – S-3). Of those interviewed 3 out of 3 denied the allegation. LPA interviewed resident 1 – resident 5 (R1 – R5). Of those who interviewed 4 out of 5 denied the allegation. One resident confirmed the allegation.
Based on information gathered, LPA did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegation “Staff do not provide adequate supervision, resulting in residents falling,” therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Allegation: Staff did not communicate with residents authorized representative.
It is being reported that R1 fell out of the bed several times and these incidents were never reported to the resident’s emergency contact person. On 2/25/26, LPA Shirley requested the incident reports for the prior 6 months. The Administrator submitted a report, but it was not for the resident in question. Per interview, 2/25/26, the Administrator never submitted an incident report for R1 as there were no reports of R1 falling.
LPA interviewed staff 1 – staff 3 (S-1 – S-3). Of those interviewed 3 out of 3 denied the allegation. LPA interviewed resident 1 – resident 5 (R1 – R5). Of those who interviewed 4 out of 5 denied the allegation. One resident was not aware of the situation.
Based on information gathered, LPA did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegation “Staff did not communicate with residents authorized representative,” therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Con'd 0n 9099-C
|