1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation 2 - Staff inappropriately handled resident. Interviews with S#1 & S#2, communicated that they never mishandle any on their clients. C#1 always acts out when C#1 doesn’t get C#1 way. No staff tried or touched C#1, C#1 was just mad and angry C#1 was not getting their way. S#2 spoke with C#1’s conservator while C#1 was on the phone with them. Conservator knows S#2 did not touch or mishandle C#1. Interviews with C#2 & C#3, communicated that C#1 always create problems. C#1 always yelling and screaming and making things up. C#1 always blaming staff for everything, C#1 is annoying. C#2 also communicated that C#1 is not a good person, always making noise and making things up. Conservator communicated that they were on the phone at the time of the incident, but they know staff is nice and don’t think they touched C#1, conservator already knows how C#1 is. LPA reviewed C#1’s IPP dated 09/28/22, it states that C#1 tends to make false claims, is aggressive towards others, and has behavioral issues. The interviews conducted and records reviewed do not concur with the above allegation.
Allegation 3 - Staff yelled at resident. Interviews with S#1 & S#2, communicated that they never yell at clients. They would never yell or scream at them either. Conservator communicated that they know that staff did not yell at C#1, they were on the phone at the time of the incident and just heard staff speak loud but not yell at C#1. The interviews conducted do not concur with the above allegation.
Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated
An exit interview was conducted with Jovan Hays, Care giver, and a hard copy of report was provided.
|