1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | See continued LIC9099-C page 2
Allegation #1: Staff pushed client while in care
During the investigation, LPA Bunker interviewed Staff 2 (S2) and Clients 1-4 (C1-C4), who reported being at the facility on 10/29/2023. According to their statements, staff did not push any clients into a wall in the hallway. S2 and C2-C4 also denied witnessing any incident where a client was grabbed by the shirt and pushed against the wall. While C1 mentioned being grabbed by his shirt, he stated he was not pushed by staff. All parties involved, including C1-C4 and S2, unanimously denied any occurrence of a pushing incident.
Allegation #2: Staff yelled at client while in care
LPA Bunker conducted interviews with Staff 2 (S2) and Clients 2-4 (C2-C4), revealing a consensus that staff does not engage in yelling at clients. C1, while mentioning the incident of yelling, couldn't recall specific details about the staff involved. C1 could not doesn't remember the staff name or what the staff looked like. All individuals present on 10/29/2023, including S2 and C1-C4, affirmed that no staff was observed yelling at a client. All parties, including S1-S2 and C2-C4, firmly denied the allegation.
The investigation consisted of the following: Interviews with Staff 1-2 (S1-S2) and Clients 2-4 (C2-C4), emphasizing their collective assertion that staff neither pushed nor yelled at any clients. Licensee Cori Waters stated she promptly self-reported the special incident report to relevant agencies, affirming the facility's zero-tolerance policy. S1-S2 emphasized their training and competence in meeting clients' needs, assuring that necessary precautions are taken to prevent harm. Both S1-S2 and C2-C4 unequivocally denied any physical or verbal abuse, with C1-C4 expressing contentment and satisfaction with the staff. S1-S2 and C2-C4 denied all allegations, underscoring the positive environment and care provided at the facility.
Based on interviews, available evidence, observation, information received, and records reviewed there was not enough sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated.
A copy of the Complaint Investigation Report LIC9099 and LIC9099-C was provided to the facility Licensee.
There were no deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted. |