1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Cont.
Allegation: The facility is falsely advertising services to prospective residents.
LPA interviewed S1, S1 denied the allegation. S1 stated all residents, or their responsible party are given a pamphlet of services and are required to sign admission agreement and care plans incorporated into their agreement and a provided a copy at the time of admission or shortly thereafter. LPA interviewed Business Office Manager S2, S2 denied the allegation. S2 confirmed all residents, or their responsible party are given a pamphlet of services and are required to sign admission agreement and care plans incorporated into their agreement and a provided a copy at the time of admission or shortly thereafter. S1 was asked by LPA if R1 made any request for services and if services advertised were denied S1 stated “no”. LPA asked Staff S2 if R1 made any request for services and if services advertised were denied S2 stated “no”. LPA reviewed resident R1’s file and required documents were in the file and signed. LPA interviewed R1, R1 was asked if he received a copy of his admissions agreement R1 stated to LPA ‘I think I have a copy of my paperwork’. R1 was asked how he heard about the facility R1 stated “ I think from a web site Caring dot com”. LPA asked R1 if R1 remembers seeing any advertising form this facility R1 stated “ I did not see any advertising about this place”. LPA interviewed resident (R2-R5) all denied the allegation, Resident R2- R5 confirmed that they have had no issues regarding false advertising or not receiving services..
Based on information gathered, the department did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations, did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated.
Findings
Based on information gathered, the department did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegations listed above. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations, did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the LIC 9099 was provided to Narine Mertkhanyan Administrator (S1
|