1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff did not accord resident privacy during telephone calls.
The details of the complaint alleged that facility staff did not accord client’s privacy during telephone calls.
During the records review, LPA Iniguez observed the notes taken by CCIB specialist in the body of the LIC 802, CCIB Analyst could hear a door opening and closing during the call, and (C#1) frequently spoke to the staff in the room to ask questions about the facility address and the staff could be heard responding. CCIB Analyst heard another person (possibly the staff) advise (C#1) that they had to end the call.
During a telephone interview with Witness 1 (C#1), LPA Iniguez noted the following: On 8/20/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alfonso Iniguez contacted (C#1) by telephone to gather more information regarding complaint allegations. During the call, LPA Iniguez heard another person in the background telling (C#1) to end the call. LPA asked (C#1) who the person in the background was, and (C#1) stated that it was a facility staff member telling them their phone call time was up. (C#1) said they are never alone whenever they make a phone call; there’s always a facility staff next to them. LPA informed (C#1) that he had gathered enough information regarding the complaint allegations.
During this investigation, LPA found sufficient evidence to support the above-mentioned allegation.
Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above-mentioned allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), the above-mentioned deficiency was observed, and citation issued (ref. LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was given to Sara Ghassemw-Director of Operations.
|