1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Investigation revealed the following:
Allegation: Facility unlawfully evicted resident
On August 20, 2025, at 11:00 AM, LPA Allen conducted interviews with Staff 1-2 (S1–S2). 2 out of 2 staff members stated that Resident 1 (R1) was not evicted from the facility. LPA did not observe any documentation indicating that R1 was evicted. According to S1 and S2, R1 had been requesting relocation to another facility since June 17, 2025, due to concerns that the current staff could not meet their level of care needs. Upon R1’s arrival on June 17, 2025, staff began the process of identifying a new facility that could accommodate R1’s required services.
R1 was scheduled to transfer to the new facility, Simla Villas, on July 19, 2025. However, R1 declined the transfer and informed S1 and S2 that they would be leaving the facility with a friend. S2 advised R1 that leaving the facility without transferring to the new location would be considered leaving Against Medical Advice (AMA), and that re-admittance would not be possible under those circumstances.
LPA also conducted an interview with Witness 1 (W1), who stated that Resident 1 (R1) was scheduled to be relocated to a new facility on July 19, 2025, but refused the transfer. Witness 2 (W2) confirmed that R1 was expected to be admitted to their facility on the same date; however, R1 never arrived. W2 was unable to confirm or deny the reason for R1 not being admitted.
Additionally, LPA interviewed R1, who confirmed that they left the facility on July 19, 2025, of their own free will with a friend who would be providing care. R1 stated they were never issued a written eviction notice. R1 denied ever wanting to leave the facility.
Based on the evidence gathered during the interviews, records reviewed, and observations during the investigation, the above allegations are found to be Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and provided to Joel Niblett-Administrator at the conclusion of the visit with appeal rights.
|