1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 10/26/25 at approximately 2:00 PM, during interviews with facility staff (S#1-S#4), (4) out of (4) stated that body checks are routinely performed during personal care activities, such as showers and dressing. If bruising or any change in skin condition is observed on a resident (including R#1), staff document the observation in the resident’s progress notes, noting the date, time, location of the bruising, and any relevant context. Staff also stated they notify the nurse or MedTech and, when indicated, complete an incident report. Also, when asked about procedures for residents who resist care, staff explained that they use de-escalation techniques, including speaking softly, explaining each step of the process, and offering alternatives, such as assigning a different caregiver or rescheduling care for a later time. Staff emphasized maintaining resident privacy and modesty to reduce resistance. For R#1, staff follow care plan strategies designed to minimize agitation and reduce the risk of bruising. Resistant episodes and interventions used are documented in the resident’s record. In addition, (4) out of (4) facility staff stated that when asked if they had ever observed other staff handling residents, including (R#1), roughly or in an inappropriate manner, all four staff members stated they had not observed any such behavior.
During this investigation, LPA did not find sufficient evidence to support the above-mentioned allegation(s).
Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above-mentioned allegation(s) are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was given to Joel Niblett/Administrator.
|