1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | provided by facility staff. Per record reviewed, R1 owes this facility outstanding rent. Per interview with S1, S1 told W1 that R1 has a payment delinquency and then denied entrance to conduct an assessment. Per communication with W1, S1 stated the family needs to contact staff first if they want to move R1 out.
LPA Shirley interviewed staff-1 thru staff-4 (S-1 thru S-4). LPA asked, if staff prevented residents from moving out of the facility. Of those interviewed, 4 out of 4 denied the allegation. LPA interviewed Resident-2 thru Resident-5 (R-2 thru R-5). LPA asked residents, if staff prevented them from moving from this facility. Of those interviewed, 2 out of 4 answered no and 2 residents did not know.
During this investigation, LPA found sufficient evidence to support the above-mentioned allegation. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above-mentioned allegation is found to be substantiated.
Based on interviews and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC9099-D.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Assistant Administrator Grace Huang. |