1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Record reviews revealed the following: a resident (R5) was admitted on 10/14/25 and was assessed on 07/15/25. Nowhere on the appraisal or pre-appraisal does it mention of any pre-existing medical condition for R5. Due to R5's behavior, staff have not set a baseline for R5. Upon R5 being transported to the hospital, hospital staff had then observed R5 to have a change of condition. The only way the facility is made aware of a change in condition, while R5 has resided at the facility, was the fact that R5's responsible person drove R5 to the hospital, as R5 denied transportation via Ambulance. This led the hospital to note changes in medical condition. Interviews revealed the following: three (3) out of four (4) residents and all four (4) staff have denied the allegation has taken place. Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated.
Regarding the allegation "Staff did not observe resident's significant weight loss" it is being alleged that staff did not observe a change in weight. Record reviews revealed the following: During the previous administrator's stay, the facility had no longer kept a weight log of residents in care. Staff one's, Maria Galvan, plan is to weigh residents once per month to keep a resident log. Log of residents weight (dated: 12/01/25) have not logged R5, as R5 denied conducting the weight log. The only log of R5's weight is from their physician's report, (dated: 04/11/25) noting R5 at one-hundred pounds (100Lbs). Interviews revealed the following: all four (4) residents and all four (4) staff have denied the allegation has taken place. Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated.
There have been zero (0) deficiencies cited during today's visit.
An exit interview was held with Maria Galvan and a copy of this report has been provided. |