1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | INVESTIGATION REVEALED THE FOLLOWING:
Allegation #1: Facility overcharged resident.
The facility is accused of overcharging Resident #1 (R1) for services. According to the report, (R1) moved into the facility on April 8, 2025, and was billed for the entire month. (R1) has two charges listed for May 5, 2025, and May 19, 2025. It is reported that (R1) receives SSI/SSP income and should only be charged $1,420.07 monthly.
A review of Resident #1's (R1) Admissions Agreement (dated March 19, 2025) shows that (R1) 's representative signed the agreement on that date. On page six, Section VI - Fees Subsection A – Monthly Fee indicated $1292.40 for fee for residential services for (R1).
On June 11, 2025, between 10:00 AM and 10:15 AM, the Department interviewed a resident member identified as Resident #1 (R1). (R1) claimed not to know the financial intricacy and was uninterested. (R1) stated that (R1) 's family representative handles finances and payments.
On June 11, 2025, between 10:15 AM and 11:00 AM, the Department interviewed staff members identified as Staff #1 and Staff #2 (S1-S2). (S1) verified that (R1)’s resident agreement signing of documents were performed on March 19, 2025. However, the (R1) did the fully take possession of a room until April 8, 2025. (S1-S2) stated that (R1) should have not been charged the full amount of $1,292.40 from April 1, 2025, through April 7, 2025. (S1) was unaware for the reported duplicate charges for May 5, 2025, and May 19, 2025. (S2) assumed the duplicate charge was for the preadmission for the month of March 2025 but later discovered that (R1) did not occupy the room for the March and should have not be charged the duplicate amount of $1292.40 in May 2025. (S1-S2) both verified there is an error in billing, and it was not intentional.
The Department reviewed invoices Facility Transaction Log (dated June 11, 2025) from March 1, 2025, through June 5, 2025, and revealed (R1) was billed for March 2025. Payments for April 2025 were applied to the March 2025 invoice, leaving (R1)’s account in the rears. Individual invoices from March through June indicate being paid in full. Nonetheless, the invoice for May 2025 did not list itemized services or charges to indicate the two charges for May 2025.
Based on the information gathered, there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation mentioned above.
(Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C)
|