1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ***This report was amended to correct the word perseverating. LPA initially typed persevering (typo) instead of perseverating, which was the word used by the Administrator.*****
Regarding the allegation: Facility administrator yells at clients
The investigation revealed the following: LPA interviewed five (5) staff (S1-5) and all of them denied the allegation. S1 stated that she does not go to Topeka often and did not yell at clients. S1 stated that she usually speaks with a loud voice and in a firm way so she can re-direct the client's behaviors. S1 also stated that she repeats what she says in a loud voice to emphasize the message. S1 stated an example with C1 where C1 was perseverating because of hamburger. S1 stated that she had to talk to him in a louder voice to explain what day it was and that it was not a scheduled day to get hamburger. S2-5 stated that they never heard or seen S1 yell at clients or the staff. LPA attempted to interview two (2) clients (C2-3) but both are nonverbal and could not answer the questions due to cognitive impairment. LPA was unable to obtain information regarding incident. One (1) client (C1) indicated that the Administrator yelled at him a lot but cannot say why he was being yelled at. C2 stated that the Administrator's name is 'Lady'. C1 also stated that he likes living in the facility and no complaints. LPA attempted to call another staff (S6) three times (3x) but was unable to return LPA's telephone calls. LPA reviewed client files, ID notes/Daily log notes and incident reports filed but no evidence could be found. LPA was unable to corroborate allegation.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did nor did not occur, therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview conducted, a copy of the report was provided to the House Manager, Imelda Chan.
|