1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On April 22, 2025, at approximately 2:30 PM, during an interview with Witness 2 (W#2), they stated that they visit the facility every week. They observed that the staff is properly tending to (C#1)’s needs and noted that there are no signs of neglect or lack of supervision.
On June 25, 2025, at approximately 9:30 AM, the Licensing Program Analyst-LPA was unable to speak with (C#1) because they were at a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) in the city of Norwalk following their hospitalization in April.
On April 22, 2025, at approximately 3:00 PM, during interviews with Clients (C#2-C#4), (3) out of (3) stated that they think the facility staff is adequately trained on how to take care of them. Also, (3) out of (3) clients in care stated that they did not witness (C#1) sustaining a fall or have an event, and they have never sustained injuries due to the negligence of the facility staff.
On April 22, 2025, at approximately 3:30 PM, during interviews with Facility Staff (S#1-S#2), 2 out of 2 stated that they are aware of the client’s rights, and they also indicated that they did not witness (C#1) sustaining a fall or having an event. Also, (2) out of (2) facility staff stated that (C#1) did not sustain injuries due to their negligence.
During this investigation, LPA found did not find sufficient evident to support the above-mentioned allegation(s).
Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above-mentioned allegation(s) are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was given to Rizalie Bondoc/DSP.
|