1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | C1 moved in on 1/9/24 and observed several body check forms which staff documented areas of marks/bruises noticed on client. It was also documented that police officers conducted body check on C1 on two visits and no bruises or injuries were found. Regional Center had also investigated on this suspicion of physical abuse. Based on their interviews, there was no sufficient evidence to show that the bruises were caused by staff member(s). It was shared that the bruises could have been from sleeping with toys, getting up from the table hastily, walking into the walls, or from another client who would sometimes grab C1. LPA attempted to contact 2 staff who were working during the time C1 was residing at the facility but was not successful. The staff are no longer working at the facility.
LPA interviewed 3 out of the 5 clients residing at the home and all 3 stated they like living here. They said that staff are nice and have never been hurt by any staff. There is no sufficient evidence to prove this allegation.
Allegation – Staff do not meet resident’s dietary needs. It is alleged that Client #1 (C1) lost 5 lbs since moving in 4 weeks ago and scarfs down food. The administrator stated that C1 was picky with food but was given options to get proper food intake. Staff interviewed stated C1 did not have any diet restrictions and ensured clients ate their meals. They also stated that C1’s family member(s) often came and brought food. LPA interviewed the 3 clients today and all stated they are well fed. They recalled C1 eating together at the dining table during meal time. LPA observed the refrigerator to be filled with variety of meats, fruits, and vegetables.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Staff M. Jacinto. A copy of this report along with the appeal rights was provided. |