1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In regards to the allegation "Staff did not safeguard resident personal belongings" it was alleged that staff confiscated C1's smoke pipe and refused to return it. (7) of (7) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (14) of (15) Clients interviews could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews show that during a room check into C1's room, staff observed marijuana in a smoke pipe and confiscated it. Interviews stated that it is against the facility rules to smoke in the room and it appeared as though it was still lit. Staff had a conversation with C1 about the use of marijuana and the effects it may have to clients who take other medications and was offered C1 their smoke pipe back cleaned. C1 did not want it back. C1 confirmed the information provided to LPA at the time of the initial visit. Based on interviews and observations conducted there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation; although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
In regards to the allegation "Resident has bed bugs" it was alleged that C1 had bed bugs in their room. (7) of (7) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (14) of (15) Clients interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews with staff stated that C1 does not allow staff to go into their room to clean it often. Staff have observed C1 throwing trash all over the floor that could possibly attract bugs but they have not seen any bed bugs in the room. LPA entered C1's room during the initial visit and observed C1's room. LPA did not observe bed bugs on either of the two beds in the room. C1 stated they have not seen any lately either and do not have any bites or signs of them at the moment. File review does not show C1's room being treated for bed bugs. Based on interviews, observations, and file review conducted there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation; although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED
In regards to the allegation "Resident's bed is in disrepair" it was alleged that C1's bed had broken springs and staff refuse to replace it. (7) of (7) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (14) of (15) Clients interviewed denied the allegation. Staff interviewed were not aware of C1 having a broken bed as C1 has not told them anything about that. Staff stated that there is an new bed in C1's room along with the one C1 uses that could be used if that were the case. LPA observed C1's room at the time of the initial visit and noticed C1 using one bed for themselves and the other bed to place their belongings on. Interview with C1 stated that the springs are not broken on their bed but it is getting a dip so maybe they would use the other bed to sleep on. LPA did not observe C1's bed to be broken or having springs popping out of it. Based on interviews and observations conducted there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation; although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit Interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided. |