1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following: in regards to the allegation "Staff did not protect resident's medication from being contaminated," it is alleged that there was a fingernail found in C1's cup of medications, and that the counter that the staff hand clients their medication is constantly wet, causing the clients medication to become wet. During interviews with the clients, thirteen (13) out of fourteen (14) interviewed did not corroborate that their medications have been contaminated by the facility staff. C2 - C14 indicated that their medications are always provided to them in clean and good condition, as if right out of their bubble-packs, and and that they do not have any concerns with their medication being contaminated. C1 showed LPA a picture of the supposed fingernail they found in their medication cup, however LPA determined that this was not a fingernail, and instead appeared to be an indentation of the bottom of the cup, while the administrator explained it was a piece of his capsule medication. During interviews with Staff, none of them corroborated the allegation that client medications have been contaminated with a fingernail or any other substances. S1 explained that during the night shift the Med Techs pop client's medication from their bubble-packs directly into cups for the following day with gloves on to prevent medication. Additionally S3 stated that while there is sometimes water on the counter in which they place the clients medication cups due to a small spill from water that they also provide clients when they give their medications, the spillage never comes into contact with the client's medications as the medications are always separated by the cup they are placed in.
Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff, clients, review of client files and facility file records, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided. |