1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During interviews with the clients, ten (10) out of twelve (12) did not corroborate the allegation. One of the clients interviewed stated that they do not smell the odor of marijuana in the facility and it is not an issue. Another client interviewed that there are times when the odor of marijuana is present within the facility, however they have not witnessed any clients smoking in the facility and believes staff are doing enough to prevent the odor of marijuana in the facility. During interviews with staff, none of them corroborated the allegation. One of the staff interviewed stated that per the house rules marijuana smoking is not allowed in the facility, only cigarettes are allowed in the patio area, and that they prevent clients from smoking in the facility. Another staff member interviewed stated that if they receive a report of marijuana odor in the facility they will conduct a room check to determine if any clients are smoking in the facility, however they have not found clients smoking marijuana recently. During a tour of the facility including the main entrance, hallways, and patio areas, LPA did not notice the odor of marijuana in the facility. LPA only witnessed clients smoking tobacco cigarettes in the patio area which is allowed per the house rules.
Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff, clients, review of client files and facility file records, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided. |