1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During interviews with the clients, none of them corroborated the allegation. One client interviewed stated that S1 does not at all represent themselves as the administrator for the facility, and that instead the administrator is Joyce Garcia which has been clearly defined for the clients. Another client interviewed also stated that S1 does not say that they are the administrator for the facility, and does not call themselves the administrator to the clients. During interviews with the staff, none of them corroborated the allegation. S1 stated that they do not advertise themselves as the administrator of the facility, and that instead the administrator is Joyce Garcia. During interview with S4, they explained that S1 is not the administrator for the facility, and that they do not require an administrator certificate in order to work at the facility. Per Title 22 regulations, there is not requirement that the assistant administrator hold an administrators certificate, only that they "meets the qualifications of Section 80065, who shall be capable of, and responsible and accountable for, management and administration of the facility in compliance with applicable law and regulation." Based on record review of S1's file and documents, they do meet the requirements of section 80065 as required.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur; therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report, along with the appeal rights, was provided. |