1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez and Ashley Calderon conducted an unannounced complaint visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Yitzi Teichman and explained the reason for the visit.
The investigation consisted of the following: LPAs obtained a client and staff roster, facility house rules including smoking policy, menu and interviewed Staff #1 – #7 (S1 – S7), and Client #1-#10 (C1 – C10)
Cook S1 and assistance S2 stated they have never received complaints about the food. S3-S7 stated they have never heard complaints about the food and denied allegations. C1.2,3,4,6,8,9 and C10 did not collaborate the allegation. C5 stated food is horrible because they spray the pan with nonstick substance that taste like metal. C7 Stated food is bland, dry and small portions. C8 Stated food service not good due to not having “decent” food. C8 stated he ate his meals today. C8 Stated food was good. LPAs toured kitchen and there was enough nonperishable food for 7 days and perishable food for 2 days.
Based on the interviews conducted and observations, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
|